Friday 28 June 2019

Ch-4 Thinkers, beliefs and Buildings


Ch-4 Thinkers, beliefs and Buildings

The sources to reconstruct Cultural Developments of this period (c. 600 BCE - 600 CE)
1. Buddhist, Jaina and Brahmanical texts written in various languages.
2. Large and impressive material remains including monuments and inscriptions.
The mid-first millennium BCE is often regarded as a turning point in world history:
1. This period saw the emergence of thinkers such as Zarathustra in Iran, Kong Zi in China, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle in Greece, and Mahavira and Gautama Buddha in India.
2. They tried to understand the mysteries of existence and the relationship between human beings and the cosmic order (Universe)
3. This was also the time when new kingdoms and cities were developing aii over the world
4. This was also the time when social and economic life was changing in a variety of ways in the Ganga valley.
The sacrificial traditions (Vedic sacrifices)
1. The early Vedic tradition was one of the pre-existing traditions of thought.
2. The Rig-Veda consists of hymns in praise of a variety of deities, especially Agni, Indra and Soma.
3.  Many of these hymns were chanted when sacrifices were performed, where people prayed for cattle, sons, good health, long life, etc.
4.  At first, sacrifices were performed collectively. Later some sacrifices were performed by the head of the family for the wellbeing of the domestic unit.
5.  More elaborate sacrifices, such as the Rajasuya and Ashvamedha, were performed by chiefs and kings who depended on Brahmana priests to conduct these rituals.
New questions in the early period
1. Many people were curious about the meaning of life, the possibility of life after death, karma and rebirth.
2.  Such issues were hotly debated. Thinkers were concerned with understanding and expressing the nature of the ultimate reality.
Debates and discussions
1. There were as many as 64 sects or schools of thought. Lively discussions and debates took place between the teachers of these schools of thought.
2. Teachers like Buddha and Mahavira travelled from place to place, trying to convince one another as well as laypersons, about the validity of their philosophy or the way they understood the world.
3. Debates took place in the kutagarashala (a hut with a pointed roof) and in groves where travelling mendicants halted.
4. If a philosopher succeeded in convincing one of his rivals, the followers of the latter also became his disciples. So support for any particular sect could grow and shrink over time.
5. Many of these teachers, including Mahavira and the Buddha, questioned the authority of the Vedas.
Fatalists and materialists
1. Fatalists or Ajivikas those who believe that everything is predetermined.
2. Materialists or Lokayatas those who believe that everything is not predetermined.
3. Fatalist teacher, named Makkhali Gosala, says that the wise and the fool cannot come out of karma. It can neither be lessened nor increased.
4. Materialist teacher Ajita Kesakambalin says that a human being is made up of the four elements. When he dies the earthy in him returns to the earth, the fluid to water, the heat to fire, the windy to air, and his senses pass into space. They do not survive after death.
The Message of Mahavira or philosophy of Jainism.
1. The important idea of Jainism is the entire world is animated: even stones, rocks and water have life.
2.  Non-injury to living beings, especially to humans, animals, plants and insects, is central to Jainism
3.  In fact the principle of ahimsa, emphasized within Jainism, has left its mark on Indian thinking.
4.  According to Jaina teachings, the cycle of birth and rebirth is shaped through karma.
5.  Asceticism and penance are required to free oneself from the cycle of karma. This can be achieved only by renouncing the world.
Rules for Jain Monks
1. Jain monks and nuns took five vows such as to abstain from killing. 2. To abstain from Stealing 3.To abstain from Lying 4. To observe  celibacy 5. To abstain from possessing property.
Jain Literature and Spread of Jainism
1. The teachings of Mahavira were recorded by his disciples. These were often in the form of stories, which could appeal to ordinary people.
2. Jaina scholars produced a wealth of literature in a variety of languages such as Prakrit, Sanskrit and Tamil.
3. For many centuries, manuscripts of these texts were carefully preserved in libraries attached to jain temples.
4. Gradually, Jainism spread to many parts of India such as Maharashtra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.
5.  Some of the earliest stone sculptures associated with Jainism were produced by devotees of the Jaina tirthankaras.
Spread of Buddhism
1. Buddhism grew rapidly both during the lifetime of the Buddha and after his death, as it appealed to many people who dissatisfied with existing religious practices.
2. Buddha’s messages metta (fellow feeling) and karuna (compassion) spread across the subcontinent and beyond Central Asia , China, Korea, Japan, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand and Indonesia.
3. Buddha’s teachings have been reconstructed by carefully editing, translating and analyzing the Buddhist texts.
4. Historians have also tried to reconstruct details of his life from hagiographies.(Hagiography is a biography of a saint or religious leader)
5. Many of these were written down at least a century after the death of the Buddha, in an attempt to preserve memories of the great teacher.
Life of Buddha (What were the traumatic incidents changed the life of the Buddha?)
1. According to the traditions, Siddhartha was the son of a chief of the Sakya clan. He had a sheltered upbringing within the palace, avoiding the harsh realities of life.
2.  One day he persuaded his charioteer to take him into the city. His first journey into the world outside was traumatic.
3. He was deeply anguished when he saw an old mana sick man and a corpse (dead body). He realized in that moment that the decay and destruction of the human body was inevitable.
4. He also saw a homeless mendicant, who had come to terms with old age and disease
5.  Soon after, he left the palace and set out in search of his own truth. Siddhartha explored several paths including bodily mortification which led him to a situation of near death. He meditated for several days and finally attained enlightenment. After this he came to be known as the Buddha or Enlightened.
The Teachings of the Buddha
1. According to Buddhist philosophy, the world is transient (anicca) and constantly changing; it is also soulless (anatta) as there is nothing permanent or eternal in it.
2. Within this transient world, sorrow (dukkha) is intrinsic to human existence.
3. By following the path of moderation between severe penance and self-indulgence that human beings can come out of these worldly troubles.
4. The Buddha regarded the social world as the creation of humans rather than of divine origin. Therefore, he advised kings and gahapatis to be humane and ethical towards common people.
5. Individual effort was expected to transform social relations. The Buddha emphasised individual agency and righteous action as the means to escape from the cycle of rebirth and attain self-realisation.
Followers of the Buddha(monks and nuns)
1. According to Buddhist tradition, Buddha’s last words to his followers were: “Be lamps unto yourselves as all of you must work out your own liberation.”
2. The body of disciples of the Buddha or an organisation of monks is called Sangha. Buddha founded a sangha. The monks too became teachers of dhamma.
3. These monks lived simple life by possessing only the essential requisites for survival, such as a bowl to receive food once a day from the laity. As they lived on alms, they were known as bhikkhus.
4. Initially, only men were allowed into the sangha, but later women also came to be admitted. The Buddha’s foster mother, Mahapajapati Gotami was the first woman to be ordained as a bhikkhuni. Many women who entered the sangha became teachers of dhamma.
5. The Buddha’s followers came from many social groups. They included kings, wealthy men, gahapatis, workers, slaves and craftspeople.
6. Once persons get into the sanghaall were regarded as equal, having shed their earlier social identities on becoming bhikkhus and bhikkhunis. The internal functioning of the sangha was based on the traditions where decisions were taken through discussions and voting.
Rules for monks and nuns
1. These are some of the rules laid down in the Vinaya Pitaka: When a new felt (blanket/rug) has been made by a bhikkhu, it is to be kept for (at least) six years.
2. Before the completion of six years if a Bhikku wanted to use a new one he has to be authorised by the other bhikkhus – it is to be forfeited and confessed.
3. In case a bhikkhu may accept two or three bowls of cakes or cooked grain-meal from a house if he so desires. If he should accept more than that, it is to be confessed.
4. Having accepted the two or three bowls and having taken them from there, he is to share them among the bhikkhus.
5. Any bhikkhu, who is leaving the lodging which belongs to the sangha, must inform to other Bhikkus.
Chaityas
1. From earliest times, people tended to regard certain places as sacred. These included sites with special trees or unique rocks, or sites of awe-inspiring natural beauty. These sites, with small shrines attached to them, were sometimes described as chaityas.
2. Buddhist literature mentions several chaityas. It also describes places associated with the Chaitya may also have been derived from the word chita, meaning a funeral pyre, and by extension a funerary mound.
What are Stupas?
Stupas are semi circular mount like structures in relics of Buddha are buried.
Where were stupas built?
Stupas were built in the places associated with Buddha’s life –
1. Lumbini-where he was born
2. Bodh Gaya -Where he attained enlightenment
3. Sarnath -Where he gave his first sermon( public speech) and
4. Kusinagara -Where he attained nibbana (Death) each of these places came to be regarded as sacred.
5. By the 200 BCE a number of stupasincluding those at Bharhut, Sanchi and Sarnath were built.
 Why were stupas built?
1. Stupas were built because relics of the Buddha such as his bodily remains or objects used by him were buried there.
2. According to a Buddhist text known as the AshokavadanaAsoka distributed portions of the Buddha’s relics to every important town and ordered the construction of stupas over them.
How were stupas built?
1. Inscriptions found on the railings and pillars of stupas record donations made for building and decorating them. Some donations were made by kings such as the Satavahanas; others were made by guilds, such as associations of ivory workers.
2. Hundreds of donations were made by women and men who mention their names, place from where they came and their occupations and names of their relatives.
3. Bhikkhus and bhikkhunis also contributed towards building these monuments.
The structure of the stupa
1. The stupa originated as a simple semi-circular mound of earth called anda. Gradually, it evolved into a more complex structure, balancing round and square shapes.
2. Above the anda was the harmika, a balcony like structure that represented the abode of the gods.
3. Arising from the harmika was a mast called the yashti, often surmounted by a chhatrior umbrella. Around the mound was a railing, separating the sacred space from the secular world.
4. The early stupas at Sanchi and Bharhut were plain except for the stone railings. Later wooden fence and the gateways were richly carved and installed at the four cardinal points.
5. Later, the mound of the stupas came to be elaborately carved with niches and sculptures as at Amaravati, and Shahji- ki-Dheri in Pakistan.
Role of Begums in preserving the Stupa at Sanchi
1. Nineteenth-century Europeans like the French and English sought Shahjehan Begum’s permission to take away the eastern gateway, which was the best preserved, to be displayed in museums in France and England. But she refused.
2. The rulers of Bhopal, Shahjehan Begum and Sultan Jehan Begum, provided money for the preservation of the ancient site. That is why John Marshall dedicated his important volumes on Sanchi to Sultan Jehan.
3. She funded the museum that was built there as well as the guesthouse where John Marshall lived 
4. She also funded the publication of the volumes written by John Marshall.
5. The stupa complex has survived due to wise decisions of Begums, and escaped from the eyes of railway contractors, builders, and those looking for finds to carry away to the museums of Europe.
The Fate of Amaravati Stupa
1.  A local raja  of Amaravathi wanted to build a temple from the ruins of the stupa at Amaravati. He decided to use the stone, and thought there might be some treasure buried in what seemed to be a hill.
2. Some years later, a British official named Colin Mackenzie visited the site. He found several pieces of sculpture and made detailed drawings of them, these reports were never published to protect the Stupa.
3. In 1854, Walter Elliot, the commissioner  of Guntur  visited Amaravati and collected several sculpture panels and took them away to Madras. These came to be called the Elliot marbles after him.
4. By the 1850s, some of the slabs from Amaravati were taken to different places: a) To the Asiatic Society of Bengal at Calcutta b) To the India Office in Madras and some even to London.
5. It was usual to find these sculptures adorning the gardens of British administrators.
View of H.H. Cole, about the preservation of ancient monuments:
1. He wrote: “It seems to me a suicidal and indefensible policy to allow the country to be looted of original works of ancient art.”
2. He believed that museums should have plaster-cast facsimiles of sculpture, whereas the originals should remain where they had been found.
3. Unfortunately, Cole did not succeed in convincing the authorities about Amaravati, although his plea for in situ (in the original place) preservation was adopted in the case of Sanchi.
Why did Sanchi survive while Amaravati did not?
1. Perhaps Amaravati was discovered before scholars understood the value of the finds and realised how critical it was to preserve things instead of removing them from the site.
2. When Sanchi was “discovered” in 1818, three of its four gateways were still standing, the fourth was lying on the spot where it had fallen and the mound was in good condition.
3. Points 3,4,5,6,7,8( about sanchi and Amaravathi stupas)
 Stories in stone
1. Art historians who have carefully studied the Ist sculpture at Sanchi identify it as a scene from the Vessantara Jataka. This is a story about a generous prince who gave away everything to a Brahmana, and went to live in the forest with his wife and children.
2. According to hagiographies, the Buddha attained enlightenment while meditating under a tree. Many early sculptors did not show the Buddha in human form – instead, they showed his presence through symbol of an  empty seat to indicate the meditation of the Buddha.
3. The Stupa was meant to represent the mahaparinibbana (death)
4. Another symbol was the wheel. This stood for the first sermon of the Buddha, at Sarnath.
5. A beautiful woman swinging from the edge of the gateway, holding onto a tree. Scholars realized that it could be a representation of a shalabhanjika. According to popular belief, this was a woman whose touch caused trees to flower and bear fruit.
6. Some of the finest depictions of animals are found in sanchi. These animals include elephants, horses, monkeys and cattle.
7. While the Jatakas contain several animal stories that are depicted at Sanchi, it is likely that many of these animals were carved to create lively scenes to draw viewers. Elephants were depicted to signify strength and wisdom.
8. Another motif is a woman surrounded by lotuses and elephants which are sprinkling water on her as if performing an abhisheka or consecration. While some historians identify the figure as Maya, the mother of the Buddha, others identify her with a popular goddess, Gajalakshmi – literally, the goddess of good fortune – who is associated with elephants.
9. The serpent motif, which is found on several pillars, seems to be derived from popular traditions, James Fergusson, considered Sanchi to be a centre of serpent worship.
The Division of Buddhism into Mahayana and Hinayana
1. By the first century CE, there is evidence of changes in Buddhist ideas and practices.
2. Early Buddhist teachings had given great importance to self-effort in achieving nibbana. Besides, the Buddha was regarded as a human being who attained enlightenment through his own efforts. Those who adopted these beliefs were described as Hinayana or the “lesser vehicle”.
3.  However, gradually the idea of a saviour emerged. Buddha was regarded as a God the one who could ensure salvation. Those who adopted these beliefs were described as Mahayana or the “greater vehicle”.
4. Simultaneously, the concept of the Bodhisatta also developed. Bodhisattas were perceived as deeply compassionate beings they accumulated merit through their efforts not to attain nibbana but to help others.
5. The worship of images of the Buddha and Bodhisattas became an important part of Mahayana tradition. 
The growth of Puranic Hinduism
1. Vaishnavism, a form of Hinduism within which Vishnu was worshipped as the principal deity.
2. Shaivism, a tradition within which Shiva was regarded as the chief god.
3. In such worship the bond between the devotee and the god was visualized as one of love and devotion,
4. Within the Vaishnavism many cults developed around the various avatars or incarnations of the deity. Ten avatars were recognized within the tradition.
5. Avatars were forms that the deity was believed to have assumed in order to save the world whenever the world was threatened by evil forces.
6. It is likely that different avatars were popular in different parts of the country. Recognizing each of these local deities as a form of Vishnu was one way of creating a more unified religious tradition.
7. Shiva, for instance, was symbolized by the lingaalthough he was occasionally represented in human form too. All such representations depicted a complex set of ideas about the deities and their attributes through symbols such as headdresses, ornaments and weapons (auspicious objects) the deities hold in their hands – how they are seated.
8. To understand the meanings of these sculptures historians have to be familiar with the stories behind them – many of which are contained in the Puranascompiled by Brahmanas
9. Puranas contained much that had been composed and been in circulation for centuries including stories about gods and goddesses. Generally, they were written in simple Sanskrit verse, and were meant to be read aloud to everybody, including women and Shudras, who did not have access to Vedic learning.
Building temples
1. The early temple was a small square room, called the garbhagriha, with a single doorway for the worshipper to enter and offer worship to the image.
2. Gradually, a tall structure, known as the shikhara, was built over the central shrine. Temple walls were often decorated with sculptures.
3. Later temples became far more elaborate – with assembly halls, huge walls and gateways, and arrangements for supplying water.
4. One of the unique features of early temples was that some of the temples were hollowed out of huge rocks, as artificial caves (Rock cut temples). The tradition of building artificial caves was an old one. Some of the earliest of these were constructed in the third century BCE on the orders of Asoka for renouncers who belonged to the Ajivika (fatalist) sect.
5. This tradition evolved through various stages and culminated much later – in the eighth century – in the carving out of an entire temple, that of Kailashnatha (a name of Shiva) in Maharashtra.
European Scholars with the unfamiliar Indian sculptures
1.  In nineteenth century European scholars first saw some of the sculptures of gods and goddesses; they could not understand what these were about. Sometimes, they were horrified by what seemed to them grotesque figures, with multiple arms and heads or with combinations of human and animal forms.
2. These early scholars tried to make sense of what appeared to be strange images by comparing them with sculptures of ancient Greece. While they often found early Indian sculpture inferior to the works of Greek artists.
3. European scholars were very excited when they discovered images of the Buddha and Bodhisattas that were evidently based on Greek models. These were, more often than not, found in the northwest, in cities such as Taxila and Peshawar, where Indo-Greek rulers had established kingdoms in the second century BCE.
4. As these images were closest to the Greek statues these scholars were familiar with, they were considered to be the best examples of early Indian art (Gandhara Art-Use of Greek style to make sculptures for Indian Gods or  religious teachers)
5. In effect, these scholars adopted a strategy we all frequently use – devising meaning from the familiar to make sense of the unfamiliar.
If text and sculpture do not match what do Art Historians do?
1. Art historians often draw upon textual traditions to understand the meaning of sculptures. While this is certainly a far more efficacious strategy than comparing Indian images with Greek statues, it is not always easy to use.
2. One of the most intriguing examples of this is a famous sculpture along a huge rock surface in Mahabalipuram (Tamil Nadu).
3. Art historians have searched through the Puranas to identify it and are sharply divided in their opinions.
4. Some feel that this depicts the descent of the river Ganga from heaven – the natural cleft through the centre of the rock surface might represent the river. The story itself is narrated in the Puranas and the epics.
5. Others feel that it represents a story from the Mahabharata – Arjuna doing penance on the river bank in order to acquire arms – pointing to the central figure of an ascetic.

Chapter-3 Kinship, Caste and Class


Chapter-3 Kinship, Caste and Class

Mahabharata, a colossal epic to understand social behaviour of early historic period
1. Historians often use textual traditions to understand Social history. Some texts lay down norms of social behaviour. Others describe a wide range of social situations and practices.
2. Texts like Mahabharata allow us to understand practices that shaped social histories.
3. In focusing on the Mahabharata, a colossal epic running in its present form into over 100,000 verses with depictions of a wide range of social categories and situations.
4. It is one of the richest texts of the subcontinent. It was composed over a period of about1,000 years (c. 500 BCE onwards), and some of the stories it contains may have been in circulation even earlier.
5. The central story is about two sets of warring cousins. But the text also contains sections laying down norms of social behaviours. Occasionally the principal characters seem to follow these norms.
 The Critical Edition of the Mahabharata
1. In 1919, under the leadership of a noted Indian Sanskritist, V.S. Sukthankar, a team of scholars initiated the task of preparing a critical edition of the Mahabharata.
2. Initially they collected Sanskrit manuscripts of the text, written in a variety of languages, from different parts of the country. The team compared verses from each manuscript.
3. Ultimately, they selected the verses that appeared common to most versions and published these in several volumes, running into over 13,000 pages. The project took 47years to complete.
4. There were several common elements in the Sanskrit versions of the story, evident in manuscripts found all over the subcontinent, from Kashmir to Tamil Nadu.
5. Also evident were enormous regional variations in the ways in which the text had been transmitted over the centuries. These variations were documented in footnotes and appendices to the main text.
Rules and Varied Practices in the early society
a.Rules about families(Kinship)
1.Families are usually parts of larger networks of people defined as relatives, or to use a more technical term, kinfolk.
2. We noticed that not all families are identical: they vary in terms of number of members, their relationship with one another as well as the kinds of activities they share.
3. Often people belonging to the same family share food,  resources, work, and live together and perform rituals together.
4. While familial ties are often regarded as “natural” and based on blood, they are defined in many different ways. Some societies regard cousins as being blood relations, whereas others do not.
5. For early societies, historians can retrieve information about elite families fairly easily; it is, however, far more difficult to reconstruct the familial relationships of ordinary people.
b. Rules about patriliny
1. Patriliny means tracing descent from father to son, grandson and so on. Matriliny is the term used when descent is traced through the mother. At one level, the Mahabharata is a story about patriliny.
2. It describes a feud over land and power between two groups of cousins, the Kauravas and the Pandavas, who belonged to a single ruling family, that of the Kurus, a lineage dominating one of the janapadas.
3. Under patriliny, sons could claim the resources (including the throne in the case of kings) of their fathers when the father died.
4. Most ruling dynasties (c. sixth century BCE onwards) claimed to follow this system, although there were variations in practice: sometimes there were no sons, brothers succeeded one another, and sometimes other kinsmen(distant relatives) claimed the throne.
5. In very exceptional circumstances, women such as Prabhavati Gupta exercised power. The concern with patriliny was not unique to ruling families but also in ordinary families.
c. Rules of marriage
1. There were two systems of marriage- Endogamy and Exogamy. Marriage within the kin is called Endogamy. Marriage outside the kin is called Exogamy.
2. The lives of young girls and women belonging to elite families were often carefully regulated to ensure that they were married at the “right” time and to the “right” person. This gave rise to the belief that kanyadana or the gift of a daughter in marriage was an important religious duty of the father.
3. There are three types of marriage- Monogamy (It is the practice of a man having one wife), polygamy or Polygyny (It is the practice of  a man having several wives) and Polyandry ( It is the practice  of a woman having several husbands)
4. From c. 500 BCE, marriage norms were compiled in Sanskrit texts known as the Dharmasutras, Dharmashastras and Manusmriti. These texts recognised as many as eight forms of marriage.
5. Of these, the first four were considered as “good” (Which were arranged by the parents of the boy or girl) while the remaining four were condemned( Which were not fixed by the elders) It is possible that last four forms of marriage were practised by those who did not accept Brahmanical norms.
d. The Gotra rules for women
1. One Brahmanical practice was to classify people in terms of gotras. Each gotra was named after a Vedic seer, and all those who belonged to the same gotra were regarded as his descendants.
2Two rules about gotra were particularly important: a) women were expected to give up their father’s gotra and adopt that of their husband on marriage and b) members of the same gotra could not marry.
3. Some of the Satavahana rulers were polygynous. The Queens who married Satavahana rulers indicate that many of them had their father’s gotras even after the marriage.
4. What is also apparent is that some of these Queens belonged to the same gotraAs is obvious, this was opposite to the ideal of exogamy recommended in the Brahmanical texts.
5. In fact, it exemplified an alternative practice, that of endogamy or marriage within the kin group, which is prevalent amongst several communities in south India. Satavahanas also had marriage relations with Shakhas, Who were considered as out castes.
e.   Were mothers important in early societies?
1.  We have seen that Satavahana rulers were identified through matronymics.  It means their names derived from that of the mother.
2. In the case of the Satavahanas we know that succession to the throne was generally patrilineal. It means sons succeeded to the throne after the death of father.
Social Differences: Within and Beyond the Framework of Caste
1. The “right” occupation
a. The Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras also contained rules about the ideal “occupations” of the four categories or varnas.
b. Brahmanas were supposed to study and teach the Vedas, perform sacrifices and get sacrifices performed, and give and receive gifts.
c.  Kshatriyas were to engage in warfare, protect people and administer justice, study the Vedas, get sacrifices performed, and make gifts.
d. The Vaishyas were expected to engage in agriculture, pastoralism and trade.
e. Shudras were assigned only one occupation – that of serving the three “higher” varnas.
The Brahmanas evolved many strategies for enforcing right occupation norms.
a. One was to assert that the varna order was of divine origin.
b. Second, they advised kings to ensure that these norms were followed within their kingdoms.
c. Third, they attempted to persuade people that their status was determined by birth.
d. They also reinforced these norms by stories like Mahabharata and other texts.
2. Non-Kshatriya kings
a. According to the Dharmashastrasonly Kshatriyas could be kings. However, several important ruling lineages probably had different origins.
b. The social background of the Mauryas, who ruled over a large empire, has been hotly debated. Brahmanical texts described that Mauryas were of “low” origin.
c. The Shungas and Kanvas, the immediate successors of the Mauryas, were Brahmanas.
(In fact, political power was effectively open to anyone who could muster support and resources, and rarely depended on birth as a Kshatriya.)
d. Shakas who came from Central Asia were regarded as mlechchhas, (barbarians) or outsiders by the Brahmanas. They ruled north western part of India.
e. It is also interesting that the best-known ruler of the Satavahana dynasty, Gotami-puta Siri-Satakani, claimed to be a unique Brahmana and a destroyer of the pride of Kshatriyas.
3. Jatis and social mobility
a. In Brahmanical theory, jati, like varna, was based on birth. However, while the number of varnas was fixed at four, there was no restriction on the number of jatis.
b. In fact, whenever Brahmanical authorities encountered new groups like nishadas – or wanted to assign a name to occupational categories like goldsmith used jati to classify them.
c. Jati means people sharing a common occupation or profession. They were sometimes organised into shrenis or guilds.
d. One interesting stone inscription found in Madhya Pradesh records the history of a guild of silk weavers who originally lived in Gujarat migrated to Madhya Pradesh were known as Dashapura.
e.The inscription provides a fascinating glimpse of complex social processes and provides insights into the nature of guilds or shrenis.
4. Beyond the four varnas (Integration of varna practices)
1. Those who could not be easily accommodated within the framework of settled agriculturists and those who spoke non-Sanskritic languages were labeled as mlechchhas or out castes and looked down upon.
2.  There was a sharing of ideas and beliefs between higher varna people and forest dwellers and out castes.
3. The nature of relations between these people is evident in some stories in the Mahabharata.
4. For example Eklavya, a forester who never goes to battle -wanted to learn archery from Dronacharya.
5. Bhima, one of the five brothers of Pandava family married Hidimba, a Rhakshasi by birth and they gave birth to a child.
5. Beyond the four varnas (Subordination of the lower varnas and conflict between higher and lower varnas)
1. While the Brahmanas considered some people as being outside the system, they also developed a sharper social divide by classifying certain social categories as“untouchable”.
2. Those who considered themselves Pure (Brahmans, Kshatriyas and vaishyas) avoided taking food and water from those they designated as “untouchable” (Shudhras).
3. Some of the activities of untouchables were regarded as “polluting”. These included handling dead bodies and dead animals. Those who performed such tasks, designated as chandalas, were placed at the very bottom of the hierarchy.
4. Their touch and, in some cases, even seeing them was regarded as “polluting”.
5. The Manusmriti laid down the “duties” of the chandalas. They were,
a. They had to live outside the village.
b. They had to use discarded utensils.
c. They had to wear clothes of the dead
d. They had to wear only ornaments made of iron.
e. They could not walk about in villages and cities at night.
f. They had to dispose of the dead bodies of those who had no relatives.
g. They had to serve as executioners.
h. Chinese Buddhist monk Fa Xian wrote that “untouchables” had to sound a clapper in the streets so that people could avoid seeing them.
i. Another Chinese pilgrim, Xuan Zang observed that executioners and scavengers were forced to live outside the city.
Social implications of access to Resources and Status
a. Gendered access to property
1. According to the Manusmriti, Dharmasutras and Dharmashastras the paternal estate was to be divided equally amongst sons after the death of the Father, with a special share for the eldest.
2. Women could not claim a share of these resources.
3However, women were allowed to retain the gifts they received on the occasion of their marriage as stridhana (literally, a woman’s wealth). This could be inherited by their children, without the husband having any claim on it.
4. At the same time, the Manusmriti warned women against hoarding family property, or even their own valuables, without the husband’s permission.
5. Wealthy women such as the Vakataka queen Prabhavati Gupta had property including lands. However epigraphic and textual evidences suggest that upper-class women had access to resources, land, cattle and money.
b.Varna and access to property
1.  According to the Brahmanical texts, another criterion for regulating access to wealth was varna.,
2. While a variety of occupations were listed for men of the first three varnas, the only “occupation” prescribed for Shudhras was servitude.
3. If these provisions were actually implemented, the wealthiest men would have been the Brahmanas, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas. The poorest men would have been shudhras.
4. The Buddhist texts recognised that there were differences in society, but did not regard these as natural or inflexible.
5. The Buddhist texts also rejected the idea of claims to status on the basis of birth.
c. An alternative social scenario-Sharing wealthin ancient Tamil Nadu.
1. In ancient Tamilnadu, where men who were generous were respected, while those who were miserly or simply accumulated wealth for them were disrespected.
2. In Tamilnadu, where, there were several chiefdoms around 2,000 years ago. The chiefs were patrons of bards and poets who sang songs in praise of them.
3. Poems included in the Tamil Sangam anthologies often illuminate social and economic relationships, while there were differences between rich and poor, those who controlled resources were also expected to share them.
A Social Contract (Social differences) according to Buddhist theory:
1. The Buddhists also developed an alternative understanding of social inequalitiesSutta Pitaka suggested that originally human beings lived in an idyllic state of peace, taking from nature only what they needed for each meal.
2.  However, there was a gradual deterioration of this status.  As human beings became increasingly greedy, vindictive and deceitful they wanted to select a leader who should be strong.
3. The leader who is selected should ensure protection of the people and should banish the criminals who deserve to be banished.
4. For his service we will give him a proportion of the rice. The leader who is chosen by the whole people would be known as mahasammata, the great elect.”
5. This suggests that the institution of kingship was based on human choice, with taxes as a form of payment for services rendered by the king. At the same time, it reveals recognition of human agency in creating and institutionalizing economic and social relations.
Understanding of historical significance of Mahabharata
a. Language
1. The original version of the Mahabharata is in Sanskrit (although there are other languages as well).
2. However, the Sanskrit used in the Mahabharata is far simpler than that of the Vedic Sanskrit
b. Content
1. Historians classify the contents of mahabharata under two broad heads – narrative and didactic.
2. Sections that contain stories are designated as the narrative.
3. Sections that contain social norms are designated as didactic.
4. This division is by no means watertight – the didactic sections include some stories, and the narrative often contains some social message.
c. Author (s)
1. The original story was probably composed by charioteer-bards known as sutas who generally accompanied Kshatriya warriors to the battlefield and composed poems celebrating their victories and other achievements. These compositions circulated orally.
2. Then, from 5th century BCE, Brahmanas took over the story and began to commit it to writing. This was the time when Mahajanapadas such as those of the Kurus and Panchalas, around whom the story of the epic revolves, were gradually becoming kingdoms.
3.  Between c. 200 BCE and 200 CE when the worship of Vishnu was growing in importance, and Krishna, one of the important figures of the epic, was coming to be identified as an incarnation of Vishnu.
4. Between c. 200 and 400 CE, large didactic sections resembling the Manusmriti were added.
5. With these additions, a text which initially perhaps had less than 10,000 verses grew to comprise about 100,000 verses. This enormous composition is traditionally attributed to a sage named Vyasa.
d.Dates of Mahabharata:
1. The original story was probably composed by charioteer-bards known as sutas and circulated the story orally for many decades.
2. Then, from the fifth century BCE, Brahmanas took over the story and began to commit it to writing. This was the time when mahajanapadas such as those of the Kurus and Panchalas, around whom the story of the epic revolves, were gradually becoming kingdoms.
3. Between c. 200 BCE and 200 CE when the worship of Vishnu was growing in importance, and Krishna, one of the important figures of the epic, was coming to be identified as an incarnation of Vishnu
4.Between c. 200 and 400 CE, large didactic sections resembling the Manusmriti were added in Mahabharata.
The search for convergence or Finding historical truth from archaeology ( B.B.Lal`s excavation and findings in Hastinapura)
1. In 1951-52, the archaeologist B.B. Lal excavated a village named Hastinapura in Meerut (Uttar Pradesh). We are not sure that this was the Hastinapura of the epic or the names are coincidental.
2. B.B. Lal found evidence of five occupational levels in Hastinapura, of which the second and third are important.
3. B.B. Lal noted about the houses in the second phase (c. twelfth-seventh centuries BCE) 
a) There were no definite plans of houses found.
b) The walls were made of mud and mud-bricks.
 c) The discovery of mud-plaster with prominent reed-marks suggested that some of the houses had reed walls plastered over with mud.
4. In the third phase (c. sixth-third centuries BCE), B.B. Lal noted-
a) Houses of this period were built of mud-brick as well as burnt bricks.
B) Soakage jars and brick drains were used for draining out refuse water.
C) Terracotta ring-wells may have been used as wells and drainage pits.
5. Weather the description of the city in the epic added after the main narrative had been composed or it was a flight of poetic fancy, which cannot always be verified by comparisons with other kinds of evidence.
One of the most challenging episodes in the Mahabharata is Draupadi’s marriage with the Pandavas, an instance of polyandry that is central to the narrative.
1. Present-day historians suggest that polyandry may have been prevalent amongst ruling elites at some point of time in Indian subcontinent.
2. Another fact suggests that polyandry gradually fell into disfavour amongst the Brahmanas, who reworked and developed the text through the centuries.
3. Some historians note that while the practice of polyandry may have seemed unusual or even undesirable from the Brahmanical point of view, it was prevalent in the Himalayan region.
4. Others suggest that there may have been a shortage of women during times of warfare, and this led to polyandry. In other words, it was attributed to a situation of crisis.
5. Some early sources suggest that polyandry was not the only or even the most prevalent form of marriage. We need to remember that creative literature often has its own narrative requirements and does not always literally reflect social realities but just used to create interest for readers.
Mahabharata is a Dynamic Text
1. The growth of the Mahabharata did not stop with the Sanskrit version. Over the centuries, versions of the epic were written in a variety of languages through an ongoing process of dialogue between peoples, communities, and those who wrote the texts.
2. Several stories that originated in specific regions or circulated amongst certain people found their way into the epic.
3. At the same time, the central story of the epic was often retold in different ways.
4.  Episodes of Mahabharata were depicted in sculpture and painting.
5. They also provided themes for a wide range of performing arts – plays, dance and other kinds of narrations.