Chapter -2
An Empire Across Three Continents
Why is it called
An Empire across Three Continents?
The
Roman Empire covered a vast stretch of territory that included most of Europe,
a large part of the Fertile Crescent in Asia and major territories of North
Africa.
What are the
sources available to understand the history of Roman Empire?
1.
Roman historians
have a rich collection of sources to study its history which we can broadly
divide into three groups: (a) texts, (b) documents (c) material remains
2.
Textual sources
include histories written by contemporaries/ historians of that time These texts were usually called ‘Annals’, because
the narrative was constructed on a year-by-year basis,-letters, speeches,
sermons, laws, and so on
3.
Documentary
sources include mainly inscriptions and papyri. Inscriptions were
usually cut on stone, so a large number survive, in both Greek and Latin
languages.
4.
Material remains
include a very wide assortment of items that mainly archaeologists discover
(for example, through excavation and field survey), for example, buildings,
monuments and other kinds of structures, pottery, coins, mosaics, even entire
landscapes (for example, through the use of aerial photography).
Explain the Boundaries of Roman Empire
1.
Rome dominated
the Mediterranean and all the regions around that sea in both directions,
2.
To the north,
the boundaries of the empire were formed by two great rivers, the Rhine and
the Danube;
3.
To the south, the Roman Empire was extended up to by
the huge expanse of desert called the Sahara.
4.
In the east the Roman Empire was extended up to river
Euphrates
5.
In the
west the Roman Empire was extended up to Atlantic
Ocean
Divisions in
Roman history
1.
The Roman Empire
can broadly be divided into two phases, ‘early’ and ‘late’, divided by
the third century as a sort of historical watershed between them.
- In other words, the whole period down to the main
part of the third century can be called the ‘early empire’, and the period
after that the ‘late empire’.
What is the Third-Century Crisis in Roman history?
If the first and second
centuries were by and large a period of peace, prosperity and economic
expansion, the third century brought the first major signs of internal strain.
1. From the 230s, the empire found itself fighting on several
fronts simultaneously In Iran a new and more aggressive dynasty emerged in
225 ,called the ‘Sasanians’ within just 15 years sasanians were expanding
rapidly in the direction of the Euphrates.
(In a
famous rock inscription cut in three languages, Shapur I, the Iranian ruler,
claimed he had annihilated a Roman army of 60,000 and even captured the eastern
capital of Antioch)
2. Meanwhile, a whole series of Germanic tribes
(Alamanni, Franks ,Goths) began to move against the Rhine and Danube frontiers,
from 233 to 280 saw repeated invasions of a whole line of provinces that
stretched from the Black Sea to the Alps and southern Germany. The Romans were
forced to abandon much of the territory beyond the Danube.
3. While the emperors of this period were constantly in
the field against what the Romans called ‘barbarians’. The rapid succession of
emperors in the third century (25 emperors in 47 years!) is an obvious symptom
of the strains faced by the empire in third century.
Social, Economic, political and cultural conditions of Early Roman
Empire
1.The
Roman Empire was culturally much more diverse , it was a mosaic of
territories and cultures that were chiefly bound together by a common
system of government in Europe, Asia and Africa and various cultures and religions.
2.
Many languages were spoken in the empire, but for the purposes of
administration Latin and Greek were the most widely used, indeed the only
languages. The upper classes of the east spoke and wrote in Greek, those of the
west in Latin.
3.
The Senate, the body which had controlled Rome earlier, when it was a
Republic.The Senate had existed in Rome for centuries, and had remained as
a body representing the aristocracy, that is, the wealthiest families of Roman
and Italian descent, mainly landowners.
4.
The monarchy was established by Augustus, the first emperor, in 27
BCE was called the ‘Principate’. Although Augustus was the sole
ruler and the only real source of authority, the fiction was kept alive that he
was actually only the ‘leading citizen’ (Princeps in Latin), not the absolute
ruler.
5.
The other key institution of
imperial rule was the army. Romans had a paid professional army where
soldiers had to put in a minimum of 25 years of service. Indeed, the existence of a paid army was a distinctive
feature of the Roman Empire.
6. To sum up, the emperor, the aristocracy and the army were the three main ‘players’ in the political history of the empire. The success of individual emperor is depended on his control of the army, and when the armies were divided, the result usually was civil war.
7.
Succession to the throne was based as far as possible on family descent,
either natural or adoptive, and even the army was strongly wedded to this
principle.
8.
An important characteristic of ERE was the gradual extension of Roman direct
rule. This was accomplished by absorbing a whole series of ‘dependent’
kingdoms into Roman provincial territory.
9. Public baths were a striking feature of Roman urban life and urban
populations also enjoyed a much higher level of entertainment. For example, one
calendar tells us that spectacula (shows) filled no less than 176 days of the
year!
Later Roman Empire
Gender Role
1.
One of the more
modern features of Roman society was the widespread prevalence of the nuclear
family. Adult sons did not live with their families, and it was exceptional for
adult brothers to share a common household. On the other hand, slaves were
included in the family as the Romans understood this.
- By the late Republic (the first century BCE), the
typical form of marriage was one where the wife did not transfer to her
husband’s authority but retained full rights in the property of her natal
family.
- While the woman’s dowry went to the husband for
the duration of the marriage, the woman remained a primary heir of her
father and became an independent property owner on her father’s death.
- Thus Roman women enjoyed considerable legal
rights in owning and managing property. In other words, in law the married
couple was not one financial entity but two, and the wife enjoyed complete
legal independence.
- Divorce was relatively easy and needed no more
than a notice of intent to dissolve the marriage by either husband or
wife.
- On the other hand, whereas males married in their
late twenties or early thirties, women were married off in the late teens
or early twenties, so there was an age gap between husband and wife and
this would have encouraged a certain inequality.
- Marriages were generally arranged, and there is
no doubt that women were often subject to domination by their husbands.
- Augustine*, the great Catholic bishop who
spent most of his life in North Africa, tells us that his mother was
regularly beaten by his father and that most other wives in the small town
where he grew up had similar bruises to show!
- Finally, fathers had substantial legal control
over their children – sometimes to a shocking degree, for example, a legal
power of life and death in exposing unwanted children, by leaving them out
in the cold to die.
Literacy in Later Roman Empire:
1.
It is certain
that rates of casual literacy* varied greatly between different parts of the
empire. *The use of reading ,writing and counting in everyday contexts.
- For example, in Pompeii, which was buried in a
volcanic eruption in 79 CE, there is strong evidence of widespread casual
literacy. Walls on the main streets of Pompeii often carried advertisements,
and graffiti were found all over the city
- One of the funniest of these graffiti found on
the walls of Pompeii says: ‘Wall, I admire you for not collapsing in ruins
When you have to support so much boring writing on you.’
- By contrast, in Egypt where hundreds of papyri
survive, most formal documents such as contracts were usually written by
professional scribes, and they often tell us that X or Y is unable to read
and write.
- But even
here literacy was certainly more widespread among certain categories such
as soldiers, army officers and estate managers.
Culture in Later Roman Empire
•
The cultural
diversity of the empire was reflected in many ways and at many levels:
•
The vast diversity of religious cults and
local deities;
•
the plurality of
languages that were spoken;
•
the styles of dress and costume,
•
the food people
ate, their forms of social organisation (tribal/non-tribal),
•
even their
patterns of settlement( village/city)
Economic
Expansion under later Roman Empire
- The empire had a substantial economic
infrastructure of harbours, mines, quarries, brickyards, olive oil
factories, etc.
- Wheat, wine and olive-oil were traded and consumed in huge quantities, and
they came mainly from Spain, the Gallic provinces, North Africa, Egypt and
Italy, where conditions were best for these crops.
- Liquids like wine and olive oil were transported
in containers called ‘amphorae’. The fragments and sherds of a very large
number of these survive. It has been possible for archaeologists to
reconstruct the precise shapes of these containers, what they carried, and where they were
made
- The Spanish olive oil was mainly carried in a
container called ‘Dressel 20’. Finds of Dressel 20 are widely scattered
across Mediterranean,
- This suggests that Spanish olive oil circulated
very widely. By using such evidence archaeologists are able to show that
Spanish producers succeeded in capturing markets for olive oil from their
Italian counterparts.
- The
empire included many regions that had a reputation for exceptional
fertility. Italy, Sicily, Egypt, Galilee, Tunisia, southern Gaul
and Baetica were all among the most densely settled or wealthiest parts of
the empire, according to writers like Strabo and Pliny.
- Large expanses of Roman territory were in a much
less advanced state. For example, transhumance* was widespread
in the countryside of Numidia .These pastoral and semi-nomadic communities
were often on the move, carrying their oven-shaped huts (called mapalia)
with them. As Roman estates expanded in North Africa, the pastures of
those communities were drastically reduced and their movements more
tightly regulated
- Diversified applications of water power around
the Mediterranean as well as advances in water-powered milling technology,
- The use of
hydraulic mining techniques in the Spanish gold and silver mines and the
gigantic industrial scale on which those mines were worked in the first
and second centuries .
- The existence of well-organised commercial and banking
networks, The widespread use of money are all indications of
how much we tend to under-estimate the sophistication of the Roman
economy. This raises the issue of labour and of the use of slavery.
Controlling Slaves/Workers in Later
Roman Empire
1.
Slavery was an
institution deeply rooted in the ancient world, both in Roman Empire and in the
Sasanian Empire.
2.
Christianity
(when it was the state religion) did not seriously challenge the slavery.e
3.
The bulk of the
labour in the Roman economy was performed by slaves in large parts of Italy in
the Republican period.
4. Under Augustus
there were 3 million slaves in
a total Italian population of 7.5 million but it was no longer true of the
empire as a whole.
5.
Slaves were an
investment, and at least one Roman agricultural writer advised landowners
against using them in contexts where too many might be required ( for harvests)
or where their health could be damaged (by malaria).
6.
These
considerations were not based on any sympathy for the slaves but on hard
economic calculation.
7. Roman upper classes were often brutal towards their
slaves, ordinary people did sometimes show much more compassion
Use of Free and
wage labour in later Roman Empire
1.
As warfare
became less widespread with the establishment of peace in the first century,
the supply of slaves tended to decline and the users of slave labour thus had
to turn either to slave breeding* or to cheaper substitutes such as wage
labour which was more easily dispensable.
2.
Unlike hired
workers, slaves had to be fed and maintained throughout the year, which
increased the cost of holding this kind of labour.
3.
This is probably
why slaves are not widely found in the agriculture of the later period,
at least not in the eastern provinces.
4. In fact, free labour was extensively used on
public works in Rome precisely because
an extensive use of slave labour would have been too expensive.
5.
Freedmen , slaves who had been set free by their masters, were
extensively used as business managers, where, obviously, they were not required
in large numbers.
6.
Masters often
gave their slaves or freedmen capital to run businesses on their behalf
or even businesses of their own
Management of labour in later Roman
Empire
1.
The Roman
agricultural writers paid a great deal of attention to the management of labour.
2.
Columella, a first-century writer who came from the south of
Spain, recommended that
landowners should keep a reserve stock of implements and tools, twice as many as they needed, so that production
could be continuous, ‘for the loss in
slave labour time exceeds the cost of such items’.
3.
There was a
general presumption among employers that without supervision no work would ever get done, so
supervision was paramount, for both free workers
and slaves.
4.
To make
supervision easier, workers were sometimes grouped into gangs or smaller teams.
5.
Columella
recommended squads of ten, claiming it was easier to tell who was putting in effort and who was not in work
groups of this size. This shows a detailed
consideration of the management of labour.
6.
Pliny the
Elder, the author of a very famous book ‘Natural History’, condemned
the use of slave gangs (as the worst method of organising production, )mainly because slaves who
worked in gangs were usually chained together
by their feet.
7.
The
late-fifth-century emperor Anastasius built the eastern frontier city of Dara in less than three weeks by attracting
labour from all over the East by offering
high wages.
Condition of workers in
factories of Roman Empire
1.
All the
practices in factories look draconian*,
but we should remember that most factories in the world today enforce similar
principles of labour control.
(Draconian:
Harsh 6th century BCE Greek
lawmaker called Draco, who prescribed death as the penalty for most crimes.)
2.
Indeed, some
industrial establishments in the empire enforced even more tighter controls
3.
The Elder Pliny
described conditions in the frankincense** factories of Alexandria, where, he tells us, no amount
of supervision seemed to suffice.
(**Frankincense
– the European name for an aromatic resin used in incense and perfumes)
4.
A seal is
put upon the workmen’s aprons,
they have to wear a mask or a net with a close mesh on their heads, and before
they are allowed to leave the premises, they have to take off all their
clothes.’
5.
Agricultural
labour must have been fatiguing and disliked, for a famous edict of the early
third century refers to Egyptian peasants deserting their villages ‘in order
not to engage in agricultural work’. The same was probably true of most
factories and workshops.
6.
A law of
398 referred to workers being branded so
they could be recognised if they run away and try to hide.
7.
Private
employers cast their agreements with workers in the form of debt contracts to
be able to claim that their employees were in debt to them and thus ensure tighter
control over them.
8.
An early, 2nd
-century writer tells us, ‘Thousands surrender themselves to work in servitude
as slaves although they are free.’ In other words, a lot of the poorer families
went into debt bondage in order to survive.
9.
From one of the
recently discovered letters of Augustine we learn that parents sometimes
sold their children into servitude for periods of 25 years.
Augustine asked
a lawyer friend of his whether these children could be liberated once the
father died.
Social Hierarchies in
Roman Empire
1. Tacitus described the leading social groups of the
early empire as follows: senators , leading members of the equestrian class;
the respectable section of the people, those attached to the great houses; the unkempt lower class who, were addicted to
the circus and theatrical displays; and
finally the slaves.
2. Senetors:
In the early third century when the Senate numbered roughly 1,000,
approximately half of all senators still came from Italian families. By the
late empire, during the reign of Constantine I the first two groups (the
senators and the equites*) had merged into a unified and expanded aristocracy.
3. One
writer of the early fifth century, the historian Olympiodorus who was also an
ambassador, tells us that the aristocracy based in the City of Rome drew annual
incomes of up to 4,000 lbs of gold from their estates, not counting the produce
they consumed directly
4. *The
equites, (‘knights’ or ‘horsemen’) were
traditionally the second most powerful and wealthy group. Originally, they were
families whose property qualified them to serve in the cavalry, hence the name.
Like senators, most ‘knights’ were landowners, but unlike senators many of them
were shipowners, traders and bankers, that is, involved in business activities.
5. The ‘middle’ class now consisted of the considerable mass of persons
connected with imperial service in the bureaucracy and army but also the
more prosperous merchants and farmers of whom there were many in the eastern
provinces.
6. Tacitus described this ‘respectable’ middle class as
clients of the great senatorial houses. Now it was chiefly government service
and dependence on the State that sustained many of these families.
7. Lower class Below them were the vast mass of the lower
classes known collectively as humiliores (lit. ‘lower’). They comprised
a rural labour force of which many were permanently employed on the
large estates; workers in industrial and mining establishments; migrant workers
who supplied much of the labour for the grain and olive harvests and for the
building industry; self-employed artisans who, it was said, were better fed
than wage labourers; a large mass of casual labourers, especially in the big
cities;
8. Many
thousands of slaves were kept as the last social group. They were
still found all over the western empire in later centuries.
cultural transformation of the Roman world in its
final centuries
1. ‘Late antiquity’ is the term now used to describe
the final, fascinating period in the evolution and break-up of the Roman Empire
and refers broadly to the fourth to seventh centuries.
2. At
the cultural level, the period saw momentous developments in religious life,
with the emperor Constantine deciding to make Christianity the official
religion
3. Diocletian
introduced ‘cut back’ by abandoning territories with little strategic or
economic value. Diocletian also fortified the frontiers, reorganised
provincial boundaries, He separated civilian from military functions,
granting greater autonomy to the military commanders (duces), who now became a
more powerful group.
4. Constantine introduced a new denomination, the
solidus, a coin of 4½ gm of pure gold that would in fact outlast the Roman
Empire itself. Solidi were minted on a very large scale and their circulation
ran into millions .
5. He divided
the Roman Empire into East and West
.The other area of innovation was the creation of a
second capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul in Turkey, previously called
Byzantium), surrounded on three sides by the sea.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment